Cicero on the Loss of a Republic

Cicero could have written this today.  Astounding.  In this short snippet from his De Re Publica, Cicero notes that we can use the term "republic" long after the republic is gone.  How sad.  The piece is at the wonderful online journal, The Imaginative Conservative, and can be accessed here.

Details

Category: Recommended Reading Recommended Reading

Published: 27 October 2012 27 October 2012

Hits: 8483 8483

Were the Anti-Federalists Right?

I have found that sometimes "Forewords" and "Introductions" can be overlooked gems.  From time to time on this site I will point out a Foreword or Introduction to a book.  Recently, I was reminded that Joseph Sobran wrote the Foreword to an edition of The Anti-Federalists (Regnery, 1999).  Sobran outlines what is really quite obvious: The Federalists have been proven wrong, and the Anti-Federalists have been proven right.  The Anti-Federalists warned that if the Constitution was ratified it would lead to the consolidation and centralization of political power, and that the States would lose their liberty and their freedom to govern themselves.  In short, they predicted the situation we now live in.  Given the season, Sobran's wise words are worth pondering.

Details

Category: Recommended Reading Recommended Reading

Published: 19 October 2012 19 October 2012

Hits: 8834 8834

Peter Leithart on Voting

Peter Leithart is one of the sharpest writing theologians around today (imho).  At  recent post on his blog he asks a simple question: what is voting for?  His answer is intriguing.  He writes: "By our votes, we endorse a particular vision of national good that we want to see realized.  Our votes declare what role we think civil power should play in our national good."  He does not quite get to a difficult question: what if no candidate appears to offer a compelling vision of the national good that we think ought to be realized?  You can read his whole piece here.

Details

Category: Recommended Reading Recommended Reading

Published: 17 October 2012 17 October 2012

Hits: 8214 8214

Herman Melville on Robert E. Lee

Herman Melville (1818-1891) published a number of poems related to the War Between the States.  His Battle Pieces and Aspects of the War was published in 1866.  A particularly interesting poem is "Lee in the Capitol."  In this poem Melville "recreates" a scene--where Lee appears before a Reconstuction Committee of Congress (spring of 1866).  Melville took what he called "poetical liberty" and wrote a poem about this event, and in the poem "recreates" Lee's testimony.

One of the most interesting aspects of the poem is where Melville poignantly points out the relationship (conceptually and principially) between George Washington and Robert E. Lee.

The key lines read as follows:

Who looks at Lee must think of Washington

In pain must think, and hide the thought,

So deep with grievous meaning it is fraught.

Indeed, when one "looks at Lee" one sees Washington, for Lee did what Washington would have done if Washington had been living in the 1860s: he would have defended his homeland against invasion.  Lee was committed to the Union, and wanted to see it thrive and prosper.  Lincoln had even asked Lee to play a leadership role in the Union army.  However, once Lincoln raised troops for the purpose of invading the South, there was no real question of what a principled Virginian like Lee had to do.  Lee, as he ought, chose to defend his land and family and neighbors against foreign invasion.  I suspect that in the line above, "In pain must think, and hide the thought," Melville is closing in on a difficult reality: If there is that much similarity between Washington and Lee, then what does it mean to be an American? That is, if Lee was simply being faithful to the principles and realities of constitutional government, why would Lincoln invade Virginia?  Is it possible that Lee was actually right?  And if that is the case, it is tempting (and perhaps almost existentially necessary, in Melville's words) to "hide the thought."  For, if Lee--and not Lincoln--was the true heir of the best of American thought and principles, the implications are quite grievous indeed.

Details

Category: Recommended Reading Recommended Reading

Published: 14 October 2012 14 October 2012

Hits: 8241 8241